EOT Claim Management in Construction: Nine Emotional Disciplines for Success
- Jinoy Viswan
- Sep 21
- 4 min read
A project slips.
The drawing is not issued, the permit is delayed, a Key delivery does not arrive.
The calendar moves forward but the work stands still. At that moment, what decides the contractor’s fate is not only the contract. It is the reaction.
EOT claims are built on Notices, programmes, and records. Yet behind every submission is a team under pressure, responding in real time. Some contractors stay measured, patient, and precise. Others rush, exaggerate, or lose control. The difference is decisive.
Entitlement is shaped not only by what happened on site, but by how it was recorded, communicated, and defended.
Why Emotional Discipline Matters
EOT claims are tested under two lenses: the contract and the tribunal. Clauses define entitlement, but tribunals also test credibility. Delay analysis without composure often reads as overstatement. Records without honesty lose weight. Notices issued in anger are easily dismissed.
The nine disciplines below show how emotional control intersects with technical compliance to produce claims that survive scrutiny.
1. Stay Calm
Disputes invite urgency, sometimes confrontation. A contractor who reacts impulsively risks sending a Notice that is unclear, late, or defensive. Calmness allows teams to comply with requirements under FIDIC Sub-Clause 20.1 or NEC Core Clauses, ensuring Notices are structured, timely, and enforceable. Tribunals value measured language over rhetoric.
2. Be Patient
EOT claims take time.
Employer reviews, Engineer determinations, and dispute boards often stretch over months or years. Impatience leads to incomplete submissions or premature escalation. Patience does not mean inaction. It means preparing the claim methodically, supported by contemporaneous records and aligned with contract timelines. A patient contractor arrives in arbitration with evidence intact.
3. Show Empathy
Understanding the employer’s perspective strengthens credibility.
Acknowledging the pressures of budget, delivery milestones, and public scrutiny does not reduce entitlement. It demonstrates reasonableness. Tribunals note whether a contractor has made genuine efforts to resolve matters, or simply pursued self-interest. Empathy reduces confrontation and frames the contractor as a professional, not an adversary.
4. Communicate Clearly
Ambiguity is a common cause of disputes.
A Notice that says “delay due to employer” is weak. A Notice that states: “On 14 March, approval of Shop Drawing SD-41 was not received. This prevented mobilisation of structural steel. Critical Path Activity C14 delayed by 18 days” is persuasive. Clear communication converts claim language into tribunal-ready fact.
Comparing Notices: Emotion vs. Discipline
Tribunals often see Notices written in the heat of frustration. For example:
❌ “The Employer’s constant delays are unacceptable. We will hold you responsible for all time and cost overruns.”
Such wording is emotionally charged, vague, and unhelpful. It lacks dates, causation, and contractual reference.
Now compare with a disciplined Notice:
✅ “On 14 March 2025, approval of Shop Drawing SD-41 was not received as scheduled. This prevented mobilisation of structural steel works, delaying Critical Path Activity C14 by 18 days. Pursuant to Sub-Clause 20.1 of the Contract, the Contractor gives Notice of delay.”
The second example is calm, factual, and clause-anchored. It demonstrates compliance and credibility, while leaving no doubt as to cause, effect, and entitlement.
5. Be Honest
Exaggerated claims fail.
Tribunals test not only the programme logic but the integrity of the contractor. Overstating impacts or concealing contributory delay erodes credibility across the entire claim. Honesty anchors entitlement. Where records prove 12 days of delay, claiming 20 may discredit the other eight—and risk losing all.
6. Keep Records
Daily logs, progress photographs, minutes of meeting, RFI registers, correspondence, these are the backbone of an EOT claim. Yet under pressure, record-keeping is often neglected. Tribunals draw a line between contemporaneous documents and recollections created later. Emotional discipline means maintaining records consistently, even when disputes escalate. Without records, entitlement becomes speculation.
7. Stay Constructive
Disputes are not won by anger.
Contractors who remain constructive demonstrate professionalism. This does not mean being passive. It means proposing mitigation measures, resequencing, or acceleration where feasible. Tribunals look favourably on contractors who present solutions, not only grievances. Constructive conduct reinforces entitlement by showing the contractor acted as a prudent party.
8. Seek Help
EOT claims are complex. Concurrency, float ownership, or resource productivity are not issues to improvise.
External experts; delay analysts, quantum specialists, legal advisers, add perspective and rigour. Contractors who seek help early align claims with SCL Protocol and AACE RP 29R-03, ensuring methodology and narrative are tribunal-grade. Help is not weakness. It is strategy.
9. Balance Emotion with Fact
Claims succeed where evidence and credibility meet.
Emotional discipline prevents rushed submissions, exaggerated statements, or antagonistic correspondence. Facts remain central: delay events, records, critical path analysis. Yet the manner in which they are presented—calm, patient, honest, and constructive—decides whether they are accepted.
Tribunal Perspective on Credibility
Tribunals consistently test credibility as rigorously as they test delay analysis.
A contractor who arrives with accurate records, clear Notices, and measured conduct is more persuasive than one who exaggerates impacts or withholds information. Emotional control, far from being a soft skill, is part of entitlement strategy.
Tailpiece
Every project tests people before it tests contracts.
Delays trigger frustration, pressure, even conflict. But entitlement is not preserved by emotion. It is preserved by discipline.
The contractors who succeed in EOT claims are those who stay calm when pressed, patient when challenged, and honest when tempted to overstate. They record every fact, they communicate with clarity, and they seek expertise when required.
Because claims are not decided only on programmes and clauses.
They are decided on credibility. And credibility, once lost, is never regained.
Comments